$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                    $                                     $                    $   THE HISTORY OF BRITISH PHREAKING  $                    $   -=- -=-=-=- -- -=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-  $                    $                                     $                    $     THE SECOND IN A SERIES OF       $                    $     THE HISTORY OF.....PHILES       $                    $                                     $                    $       WRITTEN AND UPLOADED BY:      $                    $                                     $                    $$$$$$$$$$$$-= LEX LUTHOR =-$$$$$$$$$$$                    $                 AND                 $                    $          THE LEGION OF DOOM!        $                    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Note: The British post office, is the US Equivalent of Ma Bell.

In Britain, phreaking goes back to the early fifties, when the technique of 'toll a drop back' was discovered. Toll a was an exchange near St. Pauls which routed calls between London and nearby non-London exchanges. The trick was to dial an unallocate number, and then depress thereceiver-rest for 1/2 second. This flashing initiated the 'clear forward'signal, leaving the caller with an open line into the toll exchange. Thecould then dial 018, which forwarded him to the trunk exchange at thattime, the first long distance exchange in Britain and follow it with thecode for the distant exchange to which he would be connected at no extracharge.

The signals needed to control the UK network today were published in the "institution of post office engineers journal" and reprinted in the Sunday Times (15 Oct. 1972).

The signalling system they use: signalling system no. 3 uses pairs of frequencies selected from 6 tones separated by 120hz. With that info, the phreaks made "bleepers" or as they are called here in the US. "blue box", but they do utilise different mf tones then the US., Thus, your US.Blue box that you smuggled into the UK will not work, unless you changethe frequencies.

In the early seventies, a simpler system based on different numbers of pulses with the same frequency (2280hz) was used. For more info on that,try to get a hold of: atkinson's "telephony and systems technology".

In the early days of British phreaking, the Cambridge university titan computer was used to record and circulate numbers found by the exhaustivedialling of local networks. These numbers were used to create a chain oflinks from local exchange to local exchange across the country, bypassingthe trunk circuits. Because the internal routing codes in the UK networkare not the same as those dialled by the caller, the phreaks had todiscover them by 'probe and listen' techniques or more commonly known inthe US-- Scanning. What they did was put in likely signals and listened to find out if they succeeded. The results of scanning were circulated toother phreaks. Discovering each other took time at first, but eventuallythe phreaks became organised. The "map" of Britain wascalled "undercurrents" which enabled British phreaks to share the info onnew numbers, equipment etc.

To understand what the British phreaks did, think of the phone network inthree layers of lines: local, trunk, and international. In the UK, subscriber trunk dialling (std), is the mechanism which takes a call fromthe local lines and (legitimately) elevates it to a trunk or internationallevel.The UK phreaks figured that a call at trunk level can be routedthrough any number of exchanges, provided that the right routing codeswere found and used correctly. They also had to discover how to get fromlocal to trunk level either without being charged (which they did with ableeper box) or without using (std). Chaining has already been mentionedbut it requires long strings of digits and speech gets more and more faintas the chain grows, just like it does when you stack trunks back and forthacross the U.S. The way the security reps snagged the phreaks was to put a simple 'printermeter' or as we call it: a pen register on the suspects line, which shows every digit dial d from the subscribers line.

The British prefer to get onto the trunks rather than chaining. One way was to discover where local calls use the trunks between neighbouring exchanges, start a call and stay on the trunk instead of returning to thelocal level on reaching the distant switch. This again required exhaustive dialing and made more work for titan; it also revealed'fiddles', which were inserted by post office engineers.

What fiddling means is that the engineers rewired the exchanges for theirown benefit. The equipment is modified to give access to a trunk with out being charged, an operation which is pretty easy in step by step (sxs) electromechanical exchanges, which were installed in Britain even inthe 1970s (note: I know of a back door into the Canadian system on a 4aco., So if you are on sxs or a 4a, try scanning 3 digit exchanges, i.e.:dial 999,998,997 etc. and listen for the beep-kerchink, if there are no 3digit codes which allow direct access to a tandem in your local exchange and bypasses the ama so you won't be billed, not have to blast 2600 everytime you wish to box a call.

A famous British 'fiddler' revealed in the early 1970s worked by dialling173. The caller then added the trunk code of 1 and the subscribers local number. At that time, most engineering test services began with 17x, so the engineers could hide their fiddles in the nest of service wires. Whensecurity reps started searching, the fiddles were concealed by tonessignalling: 'number unobtainable' or 'equipment engaged' which switchedoff after a delay. The necessary relays are small and easily hidden.

There was another side to phreaking in the UK in the sixties. Before std was widespread, many 'ordinary' people were driven to. Occasional phreaking from sheer frustration at the inefficient operator controlled trunk system. This came to a head during a strike about 1961 whenoperators could not be reached. Nothing complicated was needed. Manyoperators had been in the habit of repeating the codes as they dialled therequested numbers so people soon learnt the numbers they calledfrequently. The only trick' was to know which exchanges could be dialledthrough to pass on the trunk number. callers also needed a pretty quietplace to do it, since timing relative to clicks was important the mostfamous trial of British phreaks was called the old bailey trial. Whichstarted on 3 Oct. 1973. What they phreaks did was to dial a spare numberat a local call rate but involving a trunk to another exchange then theysend a 'clear forward' to their local exchange, indicating to it that thecall is finished; but the distant exchange doesn't realise because thecaller's phone is still off the hook. They now have an open line into thedistant trunk exchange and sends to it a 'seize' signal: '1' which putshim onto its outgoing lines now, if they know the codes, the world is opento them. All other exchanges trust his local exchange to handle thebilling; they just interpret the tones they hear. Mean while, the localexchange collects only for a local call.

The investigators discovered the phreaks holding a conference somewhere in England surrounded by various phone equipment and bleeper boxes, also printouts listing 'secret' post office codes. (they probably got them from trashing?) The judge said: "some take to heroin, some take totelephones" for them phone phreaking was not a crime but a hobby to beshared with fellow enthusiasts and discussed with the post office openlyover dinner and by mail. Their approach and attitude to the worldslargest computer, the global telephone system, was that of scientistsconducting experiments or programmers and engineers testing programs andsystems. The judge appeared to agree, and even asked them for phreakingcodes to use from his local exchange!!!